Home / Fitness Workouts / Is Static Stretching the Best Strategy for Injury Prevention and Performance Enhancement? FitnessFreakClub

Is Static Stretching the Best Strategy for Injury Prevention and Performance Enhancement? FitnessFreakClub

Static stretching is a extremely debated and arguable subject inside the health and sports activities efficiency communities, and is concentrated round the idea that that sustained static stretching may just impair next efficiency (Rossi et al. 2010; Shrier 2004; Behm and Chaouachi 2011; Kay and Blazevich 2012). This has ended in a shift from static stretching inside of a warm-up to a bigger emphasis on dynamic stretching by myself.

However, is that this the most efficient technique for harm prevention and function enhancement? We could take a look at a contemporary systematic overview that integrated a comparability of the consequences of static stretching and dynamic stretching on efficiency, vary of movement and harm prevention. The find out about discovered static stretching <60 seconds is thought of as an efficient way for expanding joint vary of movement (ROM), and is frequently idea to reinforce efficiency and scale back the prevalence of activity-related accidents. It additionally mentioned that post-stretching dynamic exercise is advisable for decreasing muscle accidents and lengthening joint ROM with inconsequential results on next athletic efficiency (Behm, Blazevich, & McHugh 2016). A find out about through Kay & Blazevich (2012) researched pre-exercise static muscle stretching and the experiences of relief in energy and drive manufacturing. The important thing findings from this find out about confirmed static stretches of <45 seconds can be utilized in a pre-exercise protocol with out vital decreases in “energy, energy, or speed-dependent job performances.” Further findings confirmed static stretches > 60 seconds “are much more likely to motive a small or reasonable relief in efficiency,” and those pre-exercise techniques don’t seem to be usually used for each the athlete and common inhabitants. Behm & Chaouachi (2011) discovered shorter periods of stretching inside of a warm-up, reminiscent of a complete stretching length in step with muscle of 30 seconds would possibly no longer negatively have an effect on next efficiency, particularly if the inhabitants is extremely educated.

What are we able to conclude with this data? First, we will have to take a look at the explanations to static stretch. Static stretching can also be really helpful in some ways, reminiscent of correcting muscle imbalances, reducing muscle hypertonicity, expanding joint ROM, relieving joint rigidity, making improvements to the extensibility of the musculotendinous junction, keeping up the standard purposeful size of a muscle (length-tension relationships), reducing the risk of damage and in flip improving energy and energy (Clark, Lucett, & Sutton 2010 & 2014).

What will have to be famous is, the forgoing analysis research are lacking the significance of exams and which explicit muscle mass will have to to be stretched and why. A scientific method previous to activity or efficiency actions will have to be used with any stretching protocol, and will have to come with, however no longer restricted to, the next motion monitors as acceptable: the overhead squat review, unmarried leg squat review, changed squat review, game explicit exams (such because the Touchdown Error Scoring Evaluate) and for the ones educated, goniometric and handbook muscle checking out. Those exams are ready to spot muscle overactivity, muscle underactivity, and hit upon muscle imbalances and inaccurate motion patterns. From the ones findings, the people stretching actions would center of attention at the muscle mass that had been discovered to be inflicting the inaccurate motion development(s) (Clark, Lucett, & Sutton 2010 & 2014). The consequences would additionally decide the right kind stretching protocol and what have an effect on it’s going to have on making improvements to length-tension relationships, drive coupling, neuromuscular potency, joint arthrokinematics, harm prevention, and function enhancement.

In conclusion, when operating with any inhabitants, a flexibility program is vital for lots of causes and will have to be designed for the precise wishes of each and every particular person.

The NASM Built-in Flexibility Continuum

Various kinds of stretching elicit several types of responses from the neuromuscular gadget. It is very important perceive the several types of flexibility ways so as to follow the best flexibility coaching program in response to exams, wishes, and targets for each and every shopper or athlete (Clark & Lucett 2010).

There are 3 levels of flexibleness used with the OPT™ fashion: corrective flexibility, lively flexibility and dynamic flexibility.

Corrective Flexibility:

Used within the OPT stabilization degree, is designed to handle altered joint movement through making improvements to commonplace muscle imbalances and joint ROM. Corrective flexibility makes use of self-myofascial liberate (SMR) adopted through static stretching. Corrective flexibility employs autogenic inhibition, the method when neural impulses sensing pressure are more than the impulses inflicting muscle contraction, thus, inflicting the muscle to calm down.

Acute variables for corrective flexibility:

  • SMR
    • Practice delicate force (by the use of foam curler or identical apparatus) on comfortable issues/knots
    • Dangle 30 seconds (minimal)
  • Static stretch
    • 1-Three units
    • Dangle to start with level of hysteria for 30 seconds

Lively Flexibility:

Pre-activity warm-up after motion compensations are addressed, suitable for the OPT energy degree, is designed to reinforce cushy tissue extensibility in all planes of movement through using reciprocal inhibition using agonists and synergists to transport a limb thru a complete vary of movement whilst the purposeful antagonists are being stretched.

Acute variables for lively flexibility:

  • SMR (see above)
  • Lively-isolated stretches
    • Dangle previous first level of hysteria 1-2 seconds
    • Five-10 repetitions
    • 1-2 units

Practical Flexibility:

Pre-activity warm-up in energy segment of coaching, used within the OPT energy degree, is designed to reinforce multiplanar cushy tissue extensibility and supply optimal neuromuscular keep an eye on all over the whole vary of movement whilst acting purposeful actions that make the most of the frame’s muscle mass to keep an eye on the rate, route and depth of the stretch. Practical flexibility makes use of dynamic stretching after SMR.

Acute variables for purposeful stretching:

  • SMR (see above)
  • Dynamic stretches
    • 1-2 units
    • 10-15 repetitions
    • Three-10 workouts

Examples of dynamic stretches come with:

  • Prisoner squats
  • Mulitplanar lunges with succeed in
  • Unmarried-leg squat touchdowns
  • Tube strolling
  • Medication ball chop and raise
  • Medication ball lunge with rotation
  • Push-u.s.with rotation
  • Russian twists



Behm D, Blazevich A, Kay A, McHugh M. Acute results of muscle stretching on bodily efficiency, vary of movement, and harm prevalence in wholesome lively people: a scientific overview. Implemented Body structure, Diet & Metabolism [serial online]. January 2016;41(1):1-11. To be had from: SPORTDiscus with Complete Textual content, Ipswich, MA. Accessed April 17, 2017.

Behm, D. G., & Chaouachi, A. (2011). A overview of the extreme results of static and dynamic stretching on efficiency. Eu Magazine Of Implemented Body structure, 111(11), 2633-2651. doi:10.1007/s00421-Zero11-1879-

Clark, M., & Lucett, S. (2010). NASM necessities of sports activities efficiency coaching. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Well being/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Clark, M., Lucett, S., & Sutton, B. G. (2014). NASM necessities of corrective activity coaching. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Studying

Kay, A. D., & Blazevich, A. J. (2012, 01). Impact of Acute Static Stretch on Maximal Muscle Efficiency. Medication & Science in Sports activities & Workout, 44(1), 154-164. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e318225cb27

Rossi, L., Pereira, R., Simão, R., Brandalize, M., & Gomes, A. (2010, 01). Affect of Static Stretching Length on Quadriceps Power Construction and Eletromyographic Job. Human Motion, 11(2). doi:10.2478/v10038-Zero10-0020-Four

Shrier, I. 2004. Does stretching reinforce efficiency? A scientific and significant overview of the literature. Clin. J. Recreation Med. 14: 267–273. doi:10.1097/00042752-200409000-00004. PMID:15377965.

About admin

Check Also

movement prep 3 easy steps to improve your workout warm up fitnessfreakclub 310x165 - Movement Prep: 3 Easy Steps to Improve Your Workout Warm-up FitnessFreakClub

Movement Prep: 3 Easy Steps to Improve Your Workout Warm-up FitnessFreakClub

For as some ways as there are to problem the physique in a exercise, what …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *